Blog
Practical guidance on ISO compliance, LIMS best practices, and laboratory quality management.
The 2017 revision of ISO 17025 introduced risk-based thinking, updated impartiality requirements, and new flexibility in how labs document their QMS. We break down what changed and what it means for your daily operations.
Read articleManual QC chart review is time-consuming and error-prone. We look at how a LIMS with built-in Westgard rule evaluation catches out-of-control situations before results leave the lab.
Read articleMost LIMS implementations take months. We explain the architectural decisions — intake links, guided wizards, bulk import, and the go-live readiness checklist — that let labs go live in days.
Read articleClause 7.11 requires labs to keep records of who reviewed, approved, and modified test results. We explain what an audit-trail-compliant LIMS must record and how electronic signatures satisfy accreditation body expectations.
Read articleUncertainty of measurement is one of the most misunderstood requirements in ISO 17025. We explain the GUM framework and why connecting uncertainty budgets directly to test methods in your LIMS saves hours of manual calculation.
Read articleWhen your LIMS is in the cloud, how do you know your data is truly isolated from other labs? We explain the schema-per-tenant model BLIMS uses and why it provides stronger guarantees than row-level security alone.
Read articleNew articles on ISO compliance, QC best practices, and LIMS strategy — delivered to your inbox once a month.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.